So we ambled around... It wasn't 6 years ago and you couldn't walk across the "Telescope Field" with all the vendor tents, which had displaced all the home-built telescopes. This year there were a total of 3 vendors at the edge of the deserted field. Fortunately, as we continued down "Telescope Alley" we ran into the camp of Gerry Logan and Bob Pfaff, telescope makers extraordinaire! RTMC attendance could drop to 50, and as long as Gerry was there to talk to, I'd be coming back! He had repackaged a 7" Schupmann telescope, folding it and building a new chain drive mounting for it, shown at left.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c9c5/0c9c520332a5cf67fc559b32ec929168f51ee57f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3d61/a3d61ffa2e25da377f187644c9cdc9d37f5841f5" alt=""
lunar eclipse that night!), there wasn't much serious observing going on - most everyone was looking at Saturn that was moderately high in the Southeastern sky. Interestingly, there were 3 scopes about the same size to compare - Tele Vue had a 5" Petzval (4 elements in 2 groups) that works at F/5.2, VERY fast for a refractor, but at about 180X, was showing pretty good views of Saturn. Shown at left with the deserted telescope field, turns out I was observing with Jose Magsaysay, who I met years ago at the Grand Canyon Star Party... A few minutes later, over at Jack Eastman's Clark 6", I waited behind TAAA member Gary Rosenbaum for a detailed look at Saturn, running about 250X. By the way, these night time shots are taken with my Canon XSi with Nikon 16mm fisheye at F/4, exposures about 6 to 13 seconds - easy to aim by moonlight and short enough to get pretty good detail.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/173cb/173cb39926bbdbd8db2274862c29f44f0fb26558" alt=""
Oh, and the winner of the 5" or 6" Saturn Observing Challenge? The 130 year-old Clark won hands down, the longer focal length and doublet way outperforming the much faster 3 and 4-element systems!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad129/ad129e55c292b5917dffbbf598675184412ef0ec" alt=""
temps, so headed back to Big Bear for our room at Motel 6, an easy 15 minute drive. The traditional swap meet usually starts at dawn Saturday, and the speaker program starts at 9, but we got a late start and swept through the swap meet on the way to Jack Eastman's talk on the cleaning and restoration work on the 20" Saegmuller refractor of Chamberlin Observatory in Denver (another Clark telescope!). Shown in the picture at left is the lens-down cell of the telescope with the director of Chamberlin shown. Another speaker later in the day was former publisher, editor, author, and software engineer Richard Berry covering much of the details of lens design from simple lenses to advanced astro-graphic systems in the 60 minute talk. He is shown at right... It was an interesting talk once he got past the misbehaving microphone system!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/778b6/778b629eedc78f6ee5b6ec46d16541d006463ec3" alt=""
the speaker program for the day, we perused the swap meet and caught up with friends and acquaintances met over the years. At left Teresa Plymate (TAAA member and current Big Bear residents!) tried to twist some arms in selling her and Claude's 14" telescope. And at right Gene Lucas and Mike Spooner discuss some details of telescope optics over lunch. We did our part in spending money at the swap meet and vendors - of course, we had to get the current-epoch RTMC t-shirts, and I was looking for a 4" diagonal for my 14" Newtonian telescope project, which I found there - interestingly, supposedly tested by buddy Bob Goff who died a decade ago! I also bought a flash for my Canon, but owned it for only about 2 minutes before a fellow who had run off to get cash to pay for it returned. I gave it up and made a dollar in the process... I was tempted by many other offerings - fortunately the attendance about doubled between Friday and Saturday.
But as I said before, as long as the meeting continues to exist and my die-hard friends continue to attend, it offers a great venue to catch up, talk shop and spend some time under the stars with some truly unique optics. I always swear I'll bring an entry next year - time to pull the trigger and show something. It won't likely grow again until we all take a step to help out. Come join us next Memorial Day!
3 comments:
Wow! You really get around! Interesting report on the RTMC. And, as always, excellent photos! I don't know if it's possible to stop the decline in amateur telescope making. Back in the day, a person could save some dough and build the equivalent of the simple telescopes offered commercially. But nowadays, who wants to take the time to grind a mirror and build a telescope mount that doesn't have star-align, goto, and wifi capability? That's like trying to get today's budding astrophotography enthusiasts to get all excited about building a homemade camera for Tri-X film. I know there would be some who are crazy or nostalgic enough for that, but the numbers would be low, just like the dwindling RTMC. I think the true motivator is a connection to the past. We grew up in that era of do-it-yourselfer astronomers and we hate to see that era (and its accompanying friends and acquaintances) come to a close. But the next generations are happy for modern innovations and commercially-available tools and have no motivation to take a 40- or 50-year step backward in capability. Your nice photograph of Richard Berry (haven't seen or heard anything about that guy in years) reminds me of the same problem with the old Cookbook CCD cameras. It's just too hard for tinkerers to keep up with the astronomical Joneses in the global market of commercial precision instrumentation. Well, sorry to sound like a defeatist! I'm really only grasping at straws to explain the phenomenon you've illustrated. I might be totally in the dark. Thanks for giving me something to ponder, as you are so adept at doing!
Hi John- Thanks for your comments! Point well taken regarding many kinds of scopes these days - why build an 8" telescope when a mirror kit costs $140 and a finished Chinese Dob is only twice that with eyepieces! But Berry's new book and a few other classics talk about other designs that I've never seen commercially. Ever observed through a Schupmann? Absolutely color-free images with a singlet lens and corrector of the same glass type - no exotic glass! How about a 12" Schiefspiegler, an 8" APO refractor? I've examined and observed with these over the years at RTMC and other events, but have never been available for purchase, at reasonable prices, anyway. The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that the Internet has killed the big national events like RTMC and TSP. Who wants to drive hundreds of miles with $4.50 gas in the "information age" with most everything available on-line. Gerry tells me that telescope making is still alive and well at Stellafane, and I may have to think about a trip to Vermont one of these Summers! -Dean
Good report. I have been attending RTMC off and on since the late 1970's. Did not attend this year due to health issues. I blame the low attendance to two factors: First its called PATS(Pacific Area Telescope Show)Held in Pasadena. If you are a dealer of delicate instruments why would you want to cart them up a mountain to a dusty site? Secondly, our hobby has changed. It is more about imaging than visual observing. I, for one, do not think that it is for the best. For example, at a not too distant star party a gent with $35,000+ of imaging gear asked me where the Vega was!!! And as more people get involved in imaging, the less people are willing to show the night sky to newcomers. I say its time to drink the coffee and sniff the star atlas! Do not misunderstand my point, I do enjoy looking at the pictures, but the fact is not everyone is going to become a Bob Gendler,Tony Hallas or RJay Gebany. Perhaps moving RTMC to a new moon weekend will eventually bring back the crowds. All other major Star Parties are on the new moon.
Post a Comment